The Retirement Plan That Never Comes
- andreweschmd
- Mar 24
- 4 min read

By Andrew Esch, MD — The Palliative Lens
There’s a particular kind of silence that settles into a clinic room when a patient realizes the timeline they’ve been planning for isn’t the one they’re going to get.
It’s not loud. It’s not dramatic.
It’s subtler than that.
It sounds like:
“I was going to retire next year.”
“We were finally going to travel.”
“I just needed to get through a few more years.”
A few more years.
I hear that phrase all the time.
The Long Game We Were All Sold
We’ve built an entire cultural narrative around deferring life.
Work hard. Save aggressively. Delay gratification. Max out the 401(k). Optimize the portfolio. Grind now, live later.
And to be clear, that’s not wrong. Financial stability matters. Security matters. No one wants to be 80 and dependent on a system that barely functions on a good day.
But here’s the problem:
In palliative care, “later” is a fragile promise.
Not theoretical. Not abstract. Fragile.
I sit with people every week who did everything “right.”
They saved. They planned. They deferred.
They were responsible.
And then biology (and pathology) showed up.
The Cost of Playing It Safe
There’s a cruel irony in what happens next.
The same system that told patients to be prudent and plan for the future often extracts an extraordinary amount from them when that future shrinks.
Health insurance, this thing we all pay into, month after month, year after year, suddenly reveals itself not as a safety net, but as a maze.
· High premiums.
· High deductibles.
· Opaque coverage decisions.
· Endless prior authorizations.
You would think that when someone is facing serious illness, the system would simplify.
· It doesn’t.
· It tightens.
· It scrutinizes.
· It delays.
· It denies.
And patients, already dealing with fear, uncertainty, and loss, are forced to become part-time administrative experts just to access the care they’ve already paid for.
Let’s call it what it is:
We’ve created a system that profits from complexity and calls it coordination.
Treatment Intensity vs. Living
Then comes the next tension.
If the timeline is uncertain, what do we do with the time that remains?
This is where things get even harder.
Because the default in American medicine is escalation.
· More treatment.
· More lines of therapy.
· More appointments.
· More scans.
· More side effects.
Sometimes that’s exactly right. Sometimes treatment buys meaningful time, good time.
But sometimes?
It consumes the very life patients were trying to preserve.
I’ve seen patients spend months tethered to infusion chairs, chasing marginal gains, while the things they actually cared about…..travel, family, just feeling like themselves….slip quietly out of reach.
No one sets out to choose that trade-off.
But the system nudges them there.
Subtly. Persistently.
Because we’re better at offering treatment than we are at helping people decide whether it’s worth it.
The Grief No One Names
There’s a kind of grief that doesn’t get talked about enough.
It’s not just grief for what’s ending.
It’s grief for what never got to happen.
The trip that was postponed.
The motor home that was for “later.”
The time with grandchildren that was going to come after retirement.
This is anticipatory grief layered with regret.
And it’s heavy.
Because unlike other losses, this one comes with a haunting question:
Why did I wait?
So What Do We Do With This?
This is the part where people expect a clean answer. There isn’t one.
I’m not going to tell you to drain your retirement accounts and live recklessly. That’s not wisdom, that’s just a different kind of denial.
But I will say this:
If your entire life is structured around a future that is not guaranteed, you are taking a risk whether you acknowledge it or not.
A different kind of risk.
One that doesn’t show up in financial models.
A Better Question
Maybe the question isn’t:
“How much do I need to save for retirement?”
Maybe it’s:
“How much of my life am I willing to postpone for a future I may not get?”
And:
“What would it look like to live a little more now, intentionally, not impulsively, while still respecting the reality of the future?”
What Patients Teach Us (If We’re Paying Attention)
The patients I see at Moffitt are incredibly clear about this, even if they wish they had been clearer sooner.
No one says,
“I wish I had spent more time optimizing my insurance plan.”
No one says,
“I’m glad I delayed everything meaningful until my late 60s.”
They say things like:
· “I wish we had taken that trip.”
· “I wish I had worked less.”
· “I didn’t think this would happen to me.”
The System Won’t Fix This
Healthcare organizations aren’t going to solve this tension for us.
If anything, they make it worse.
· They benefit from treatment volume.
· They benefit from complexity.
· They benefit from patients staying in the system longer.
Even well-intentioned organizations are structurally aligned toward doing more, not necessarily toward helping patients decide what matters most.
And insurance companies?
They’ve mastered the art of being both gatekeeper and obstacle, limiting access while extracting cost.
It’s an impressive business model, if you can ignore the human consequences.
Living in the Middle
So we’re left in the middle.
· Between prudence and presence.
· Between planning and living.
· Between “someday” and “today.”
That tension doesn’t go away.
But ignoring it doesn’t make it safer.
If anything, it makes the outcome more predictable.
One Small Shift
You don’t need to overhaul your life.
But you might consider this:
Take one thing you’ve been postponing for “later”, something meaningful, not extravagant, and move it forward.
Not because you’re giving up on the future.
But because you’re acknowledging reality.
Time is not a guarantee. It’s an opportunity.
And in palliative care, we see what happens when that opportunity runs out before the plan catches up.
That silence in the clinic room?
It’s not just about illness. It’s about timing.
And timing, more than anything, is the one variable none of us gets to control.
But it is the one thing we keep gambling with.



Comments